| |
|
|
|
Regulatory Efforts to Improve Worker Safety
Have Had Little Impact |
From:
Center for the
Study of American Business (CSAB)
By any measure, occupational safety and health were improving
rapidly before the major increase in government regulation of
the work place, according to a report released by the Center for
the Study of American Business at Washington University in St.
Louis. While the trend toward greater safety has continued, the
report finds that this is due in large part to shifts in the
nature of work resulting from technological change.
In Technology and a Safe Workplace, economist Richard Vedder
says that, while policy analysts have put forth several
rationales for federal occupational safety and health
regulation, the American workplace has steadily become much
safer, diminishing any such rationale. This has been aided by
the macroeconomic effects of technology on increasing
productivity and real income per capita, changes that have
implications for the nature of work and worker safety.
Vedder notes that, in 1960, the government spent very little on
regulating the health and safety of American workers. Today,
four decades later, regulatory efforts have expanded
exponentially, with a whole new bureaucracy, notably the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), created to
enforce workplace practices. In the related area of worker
standards and benefits, government spending has also risen
sharply. These efforts, however, appear to have had little
impact on worker safety. Technologically induced structural
change has solved many of the problems envisioned at the time of
OSHA's creation in 1970.
Employers have a significant incentive to carry out safety
improvements, Vedder says, and workers themselves consciously
choose risk levels of employment. "Workers who are risk takers
and/or want high incomes will gravitate toward jobs where the
workplace is relatively dangerous, while risk-averse workers
will trade lower wages for greater safety," he says. "The wage
differential foregone by workers in the lower-risk job is like
an insurance premium paid to reduce the probability of
occupational injury, sickness, or even death."
Annual Workplace Deaths per Million Workers

Source: Department of Commerce,
Bureau of the Census.
s in the economy, many of them at least partly technology-based,
have led to increased importance of comparatively safe jobs in
the service industries. The robust economy has also increased
real per capita incomes. As incomes rise, people feel they can
afford to avoid risky jobs.
Vedder notes that, while spending on worker safety regulations
is at an all-time high, it is not clear that regulatory
expansion had any positive impact on the reduction in death
rates in the American workplace. From 1945 to 1970, deaths per
100,000 workers declined by nearly one-half. While the decline
has continued in the regulatory era since 1970, the rate of
absolute annual decline (0.60 deaths per million workers) in the
period 1945-70 was greater than in the post-regulatory era
1970-96 (0.54 deaths per million workers. Similar trends are
observed for occupational injuries, Vedder reports.
"Summing up the historical evidence, the trends seem to suggest
that, in the absence of OSHA and similar agencies, workplace
safety today would probably be similar to what is actually
observed," Vedder says. "The benefits of regulation, if any, are
comparatively small. However, the costs are considerable." He
notes that the actual budgets of OSHA and related agencies are
small in comparison to the business costs of complying with
regulations, estimated to be about $33 billion a year.
The Center for the Study of
American Business is a nonpartisan, nonprofit research
organization at Washington University in St. Louis that conducts
scholarly research on issues affecting the American business
system. Please contact the Center at (314) 935-5676 if you would
like a copy of Technology and a Safe Workplace or visit the CSAB
web site at
http://csab.wustl.edu. Richard Vedder is an adjunct fellow
of the Center and Distinguished Professor of Economics at Ohio
University.
|